Guns ‘N’ Fetuses

Just in time for summer, the GOP this time decided to entertain us with a season of, not surfing and sun tans, but of terror and radical political division.

Can’t we have one summer of peace and quiet this decade?

The left, who are just, if not more, divisive than the right (who cares by now) respond with their usual “all is doomed” savage instincts and violence in the streets rhetoric and behavior further proving how tolerant they are.

I’ve written on abortion before, but I’ve never addressed the leftist talking point that compares “gun rights” to “women’s rights”. This is assuming women exist – NOT ‘womb carriers‘.

The argument runs along the lines of, “Guns have more rights (or at least it’s easier to obtain firearms) than women do with their bodies.”

If a man were to swallow the Pacific Ocean without bursting I’d say that’d still be less of a circus feat than this argument whose logic seems to have been aborted long ago.

I’m not necessarily going to discuss my stance on this issue but instead try and appeal to the pro-choice side to ditch this argument which probably isn’t possible by this point in history.

“Gun rights”

There’s no such thing as gun rights. Guns are inanimate objects that do not have the obligatory volition to utilize ANY rights. Much like the pro-choice side equates abortions with the protection of a woman’s right to life, the Second Amendment does just that as well in that it enables self-defense against physical force. It preserves life, arguably, just as much if not more.

“It’s easier for people to obtain guns than it is for women to exercise their rights.”

This portion of the argument states that firearms are about human rights and not inanimate object rights unlike the first part. Nothing, however, could not be more false for women OR men for that matter.

For one thing, you don’t have to have a permit to carry a uterus. You don’t have to alter the handling of your uterus in different states. You don’t have to sometimes get out of your car to put it in the trunk or in a closed container in your backseat depending upon what state you are in. Schools are not uterus free zones. You don’t have to expose your genitalia if you don’t have a permit to conceal carry it. When shipping between states, you are not required to register with a local uterus armory for registration. There aren’t certain types of uteruses that you can’t own. You aren’t required to wait months to get a uterus permit or get a background check to carry one either.

Last time I checked, abortions are widely legal in the United States in close to every state. Women are not being subjected to Taliban-type treatment as much as they’ll continue to blame men for this (even the ones who passed Roe v Wade?). In fact, if I were a woman and given the choice to live in the U.S. in 1842 (with or without abortion) or Yemen in 2022, I’d choose the 19th century any day.

The overturning of Roe v. Wade is a turning point in American history. Who knows if it will comeback but I’m getting more and more confident that this will secure a Democrat win in 2024. Say hello to President Kamala! No thought is given anymore on extreme and controversial rulings, opinions, laws, etc. Whatever.

Have an entertaining summer.

The Cruelty of An Old Man

Biden’s vaccine mandate is cruel. It’s grotesquely nihilistic and it goes to show you the full blown level of government coercion the left is crushing us with.

Do you think the Biden regime has any mercy? Are you foolish to think that the old man and his blood fetishizing sadistic goons will care as you die in a ditch because you chose not to get the vaccine? You’d be wrong. In fact, you’re so wrong you should probably lose your job just as a lesson.

It’s a twisted game of ping pong. Of course, the feds won’t let the dregs die in gutter trash obscurity. They’ll be used as poster children, of course. Some posters will brand you as a lepper and some will label you as a victim. You won’t be labeled a victim of federal coercion, but instead as a victim of the appalling consequences of government.

Knock! Knock! Who’s there? A welfare check just for you! Now you longer need the incentive to work or, for that matter, get a job. You see the ministry’s piping hot stats which COVID-infested Whacky Psaki will serve you? You justify more government spending which means YOU have to foot the bill you rodent.

Why should we care though? At least Orange Man ain’t bein’ bad no mo’!

The First Female President!

Congrats Ladies! We finally have the first female President! Let’s look at how young women can get ahead in life!

1. Have a pimp
2. Be hated by your own party when running
3. Get selected for VP based upon skin hue and reproductive organ
4. Technically only get voted into office because of the man (who you hate) you’re running with
5. Get into office – not by vote – but by disposition.
6. Accuse the country of being sexist and bomb the Middle East in the name of diversity.

The Spinning Wheel of “Science”

Read before it’s removed!

Everyone’s favorite mob is back and, like every other hit, they’ve delivered yet another change in the ever-growing mask “recommendations.”

Let’s take a trip down the “Science is Always Changing Lane.”

1. Don’t wear face masks.
2. It turns out Fauci was lying. We had to wear face masks inside.
3. Face masks were recommended inside.
4. Now face masks had to be worn inside.
5. Now two face masks had to be worn inside.
6. Face masks had to be worn outside.
7. Whoops! Change number five. We actually don’t need two face masks. Go back to wearing one.
8. By the way, you don’t need to wear face masks outside.
9. Get vaccinated because it works!
10. If you get vaccinated you still have to wear a face mask because it works!
11. If you get vaccinated you don’t need to wear the face mask anymore! Yes!
12. CDC – “Oh no! We have no way of marking our territory now! Let’s tell them to wear face masks AGAIN!”
13. You have to wear masks because not everyone is vaccinated. Always remember, “science” is objective and never changes within the 24 hour news cycle.

Since “science” is always changing every 0.1 seconds, rather than decades, if not centuries like it used to, in order to reach a somewhat confident conclusion, we better obey.

It’s easy to see what they’re doing here. They’re trying to get the unvaccinated vaccinated by having mask wearers pissed at them. It’s turning the unvaccinated into the social dregs of society. That’s definitely nothing that happens in dictatorships.

Tyrants abide by what I call the Law of Zero. The Law of Zero dictates that if we get 100% of people following orders there’ll be world peace. One-hundred percent also happens to be a mathematical impossibility especially when it comes to very fallible and unruly human behavior. So long as there’s a 1,000 year old man dying of COVID (we think?) in a nursing home, society – namely the healthy – must sacrifice their lives for his sake.

Let’s play devil’s advocate. Let’s assume it’s possible to get 100% of the country vaccinated (yeah right). Do you think the CDC will tell us to take off our masks? No. No, they won’t. Why? Because wearing masks got us to zero cases. Therefore, it’s important to keep wearing them. This logic has just been applied. They’ll say, “People that got vaccinated shouldn’t have taken off their masks!”

Either that, or there’ll be another outbreak of COVID. We’re screwed. What’s worse is that big conglomerates are unquestionably following the CDC’s orders. They’re a private organization essentially and they’re doing it because they’re afraid of repercussions. Every private business I’ve seen in my slick politically correct liberal area all have signs abiding by the CDC’s commands. Those will now go back to last year’s “science is always changing” guidelines. Why? Because people are now obedient in a country founded by disobedience.

The CDC is also proving the anti-vaxers correct in that they’re blatantly admitting the vaccines don’t work. What’s worse is that every time you criticize the vaccine, I’ve yet to hear any of them belch out anything other than, “Old people will die.” That’s bad, but do we make people wear airbag suits when driving because an old person was killed in a car accident? No. We don’t do that. Why? Because screw tyranny. That’s why.

This is horrifying. Conservatives don’t care. Libertarians are gone as far as I’m concerned. They think property rights should dictate what someone can wear on someone’s property.

The White Privilege of Storming the Capital

We all know what happened and it was only a matter of time. I’m still surprised to hear people say, “This will start a civil war!!”. Where have you been? The Capital was just stormed by the Vandals and this past summer large portions of the country were on fire as rioters clashed with law enforcement. We’re in it already and it’s going to have to get a lot worse before it gets better.

Before I get into the meat of what has happened, I’d like to educate the virgins to history as to why, as serious as this is, is not the worst time in American history. The Capital has weathered worse including other terrorist takeovers, bombings and was even literally cremated as it burned to the ground once.

Who’s to blame, for what many are inclined to believe, is the most recent use of violence on the Capital in contemporary history? Donald Trump and his goon squad, rightfully so. It’s hard to pin down exactly who that squad is now considering he fires people every 9 seconds but by this point it’s anyone who wants to be employed by him.

Of course, those who rioted this past summer and claim to be against violence will instantly blame the entire Republican Party and those who voted for him. The exact opposite could not get anymore opposite. Almost everybody on the political spectrum has spoken out against this – hypocritically or not. For the 1 in 5 Trump supporters who think he has done a great job in handling the results of the election, I’d say I agree with you as his incitement to violence on his own government worked for several hours.

The biggest discussion now does not seem to be how we can all come together and act sensibly but instead further stoke the flames of the race riots we’ve already had by blaming white people. Not only blame white people, but once again make anecdotal divisive comparisons between police conduct at similar events as, once again, white police officers supposedly treated skin colors differently. I usually have a hard time understanding the concept of white privilege but this one is mind-boggling.

How do you maintain white privilege by having white people topple a government run by white people who rule over mostly white people that provides them with their white privilege? The people that did this were savages so I can see them not thinking through their plan of preserving “whiteness”.

Of course, I’m being told by Joey B. and his massive forehead that had this been black people they all would’ve been massacred for no reason.

Thousands of Twitter pions echoed this claim with Joey B. and his IMAX screen-sized forehead actually being one of the echoers. I’m not sure who started this unoriginal and used up race-baiting eureka talking point. I’m also not sure what this point is supposed to make. Is it pointing out double standards? Is it finally an admission that what happened over the summer weren’t mostly peaceful protests? Are they saying police brutality should have been used for both?

White privilege seems to be expanding so far to the point that now even being killed by fellow white law enforcement is deemed a form of privilege as multiple whites were either killed or died later due to the raid. To top off their white privilege, 82 white privileged arrests were made. Those who were killed in a typical white privileged manner included capital police officer, Brian Sicknick and Air Force veteran, Ashli Babbitt. Sicknick was smashed in the head with a white privileged fire extinguisher and Babbitt was shot in the neck with a white privileged rubber bullet. Among the white privileged capital police, 50 of them were injured.

It doesn’t get anymore white privileged than that.

The non-white disadvantage this summer resulted in total carnage as future cackling “fweedom” President, Kamala Harris set up a bail fund for rioters to get back out and destroy things.

In Washington, DC, whose summer was so hot it was on fire most of the time, multiple prosecutors dropped charges on rioters.

We had the Defund the Police movement that resulted in hoards of assaulted police officers with one being killed. The National Guard was called in only to be ordered to move out. The Mayor of Portland, Oregon, Ted Wheeler also continuously rejected Trump’s recommendation to send in the National Guard because that’s how much he wanted to maintain white government brutality.

In Seattle we had the incredible experiment of Chop/Chaz, run by Hip-Hop artist, Raz Simone, where an entire portion of the city was seized. In fact, the local police precinct hated the rifle-brandishing African-American so much that they shut down.

Police officers even got so scared that they used their white privileged knees to kneel for BLM rioters due to their white privileged white guilt.

Since the United States has always protected white people and not marginalized groups, let’s now take a time machine back to 1954, when Puerto Rican nationalists were not killed when they shot and killed a white police officer while raiding the Capital.

In 1967, The Black Panther Party decided it’d be a good idea to storm the white-run Capital of Sacramento, California with shot guns where nothing happened to them.

Of course I couldn’t leave out feminists as in 2018, feminists broke through the police barriers on the steps of the Capital building in order to demand the removal of Justice Kavanaugh.

If you initiated devastating violence on a country to dismantle the supposedly oppressive government then you are a traitor. This is, of course, the core message of Critical Race Theory and Marxism.

What’s the cause of all this?

Of course, a scroll on Twitter will tell you white people however it is much more philosophically profound. Altruist-collectivism is the cause. When you dogmatize your movement, put it above your individual life, and sacrifice yourself for its unconditional cause you will get warfare. The belief that your side has a monopoly on truth makes possible the blood-baiting rhetoric of “you’re either for us or against us” and “you’re part of the problem”. Interestingly enough, for those who don’t identify with a side are deemed as the most complacent. It kind of sounds like so long as you’re on a side you’re okay…? Then again, that’s not true either because you must join the “right” side. We’re now all prosecuted by superficial association rather than by individual action.

Worse yet, with this logic, you’ll find massive hypocrisy as suddenly their non-existent morality flies out the window when they believe whenever their side commits a crime it’s just. The virginal “we never inflict violence” left and the virginal “we never inflict violence” right are a great example of this. They are both very potent forms of kerosene that just happen to create their own explosions. I’m not here to try and figure out which is worse. Someone’s business burning down and the government that was supposed to protect that business owner’s rights burning down are both bad.

People must view each other as individuals otherwise we’ll get what we already have. We need to find the common ideas of a free society that liberate us from viewing each other as groups defined by race, sex, and rigid political ideology.

If history shows anything, the most dangerous people are those who believe they are so right that they force it onto others.

In the meantime, the Capital has insurance, it’s just property, and you didn’t like their other forms of protest.

Biden Will Win Pt. 2

Trump is hardly making any progress in the battleground states. I’m not too surprised. I suspect by election he will narrow in votes for the rest and maybe (MAYBE) gain (with slim chances) several others. It won’t help him though.

Still, Republicans and Democrats are hanging on to their 2016 arguments – especially Trump-supporting Republicans. I still can’t get them off their 2016 trip. The Republican Party does not like him anymore. Not good. I get the feeling by this point that Trump supporters aren’t necessarily the status quo of the right but have more or less become a cult fan base. They’re so strong in support because they believe since he came to office, in what they thought would be a loss for him, that he can once again gain the presidency in a country that is mostly sick of him.

Democrats have a 2016 mentality as well probably due to their PTSD of Clinton losing. So, Republicans are confident Trump will win and Democrats are less confident that Biden will win. Polls say that Biden will win but bettors say Trump will. I’m sorry, but I’m siding with pollsters (as dishonest as they can be) rather than money tossers. Every vote against Trump, no matter how small, is a disastrous blow for him.

Just think. Four more years of election rigging allegations. Instead of Russia, it’s China. Instead of Trump, Jr. it’s Biden’s offspring. The right is already using this story as insurance so that in the event that Trump loses (he will) they have a retaliation tactic. They’re low-key admitting that there is a strong chance of Trump losing. It actually took me longer to see that than it should’ve.

The left will cling to the electoral college now if they select Biden. Once again, we really will have a one-party system with the way the left dominates close to everything in this country. I’m not just talking about major institutions like the media, Hollywood, and education but also concerts. You now have a high chance of going to a concert and being subjected to a musician try his or her hardest to become a standup comedian and hash out uninspired Orange Man Bad jokes.

The tragedy is that most aren’t voting for Trump because “he’s disgusting.” That’s why. Americans have always been a superficial group. They care about what shampoo you use, how shiny your hair is, what college you blew money at, what clothes you wear, how you talk, what’s your job, whether or not you can answer a complex question within two minutes, whether you virtue-signal, and how many vacuous stats you can rattle off. Americans LOVE numbers. That’s their passionate love affair.

Here’s a simulation: “I predict that 450,000 people will 15% of the time ransack 876,400 shopping malls if we don’t say God Bless America enough. And that will definitely happen if we go from a 0.54% chance to a 1 in 6 chance of 500,000 cases emerging by November 9. I went to Harvard. The source is in midget font at the bottom of my graph.”

It means nothing but I’m sure someone reading it would consider it as meaning something had I not said it was a simulation. It’s not necessarily that Americans hate Trump’s issues, it’s that they hate him as a person. They hate his demeanor and his abject rudeness. They’ve forgotten about issues. Demeanor is important but when you start viewing it as too important you’ll be seduced into the useless senile hack and his criminal cohort.

Superficiality is good especially for con artists. You can easily manipulate people into liking you. It’s what serial killers do all the time. Trump needs to be commended for his honesty though. Even when he lies he lets you know he’s lying. He just is and is not apologetic about it. I’ve always been a man of honesty rather than feeling fuzzy from a slick handshake from Mr. Smooth.

America, unfortunately being the unconditional land of opportunity, will give the dictatorial senile fart and Stalin the keys to what was once the free world. The Republicans, being blown to bits by Trump, will handover the senate to the left and then we’re finished. They’re the Whig party now.

Biden Will Win

But not by that much. Let me rant.

Trump since his lightening-strike win in 2016 has been under the delusion that since he won most of the country, most people were undyingly on his side. Never once did he stop and think that maybe it’s because they were hard out-of-luck and voted for him due to their disgust in Clinton. Clinton is also one of the most obviously corrupt and hated politicians in contemporary US history.

People did not want another Washington man to take office and he fit that bill. All of those arguments are legitimate and I agree 100%. For the most part, he successfully avoided succumbing to every single scandal the left tried to throw at him and easily got a feeling of invincibleness. This banquet of scandals also includes an impeachment by the way.

Due to his radical narcissism not only did he tucker out the entire country (including the right) but he also radically clashed with the already radical left. This is also combined with his incredibly abrasive and ill-mannered pig-like personality. Although, not the worst in the identity politics bloodbath, Trump is definitely a great source of kerosene for it. The left-wing media wore the country down with negative reporting on every single move Trump made. People’s smartphones lit up with news coverage while they slept much like how North Korean officials give its pions radios that spout Fat Man’s propaganda that you cannot turn off. Unfortunately, no one ignored or questioned what they had chucked at their brains.

Whenever I tell my opinion of these issues to those on the right they immediately, like clockwork, say that Trump will win again because he did in 2016. Great argument. They’ll say, “Well, Hillary was always ahead of him and he ended up winning last second.” I hate breaking it to them but someone should eventually tell them that the country has radically changed since 2016.

Their entire argument rests on the 2016 election. I agree, that polls can be very wrong but they’re not always wrong. Don’t base your argument on simply “polls don’t work”. Look at the polls and look at what has happened for the past four years.

Whenever Trump bites the dust in any region they continue to say the polls have never been right. And when Trump appears ahead, they’ll rejoice with a “take that!” attitude. They also fail to see that Biden is not hated like Clinton. His support base isn’t that enthusiastic about the resume-less hallucinatory old white privileged male they chose but nonetheless how bad is a somewhat dazed and confused senior citizen to a pit bull in a straight jacket.

Consider who’s headed to the polls now. People on the left, who didn’t vote last time in large numbers, are now voting. Young people, who are mostly left, who did not vote last election are now voting. These groups are not good for Trump’s chances. He did nothing to expand his base whatsoever. He was too caught up in how eternally “great” he was and is. He just assumed the voters still “loved” him and that there was no point in converting his haters because, after all, he won the previous election.

I believe that if Trump became more aware of everything that happened he’d easily win over King Dementia but he didn’t. He might be the first president in US history to commit political suicide and not know it.

In January and February of this year had you asked me who will win I’d say it’ll be a tough election but I’d slightly lean toward Trump. Then coronavirus emerged. What’d he do? Close to nothing. He stupidly listened to the Chinese bought-and-paid-for CDC, World Economic Forum and government “scientists” who told him that this virus was not to be worried about. Coronavirus is overhyped but he didn’t convince or sell Americans on that. Instead, he went on his standup comedy tour that no one cared about.

What’d he do when the BLM and Antifa riots broke out? Close to nothing. He immediately ordered an FBI investigation into the Floyd case but it took months to come out and definitively address the rioting. Prior to that he lazily shot out what seemed like “suggestions” for the National Guard to move in on cities but didn’t pursue it in the dictatorial manner he does when it comes to doing what he does best; travel bans. Then when he finally had federal agents go and reprimand rioters he backed off the cities that told him to. Much like coronavirus, police brutality is overhyped. He should’ve addressed the country on all of the crime statistics that no one either knows about or pretends to not know about.

On top of that, he didn’t address business owners whose lives had been pulverized by these barbarians. They were and are a perfectly vulnerable group to take under his wings but once again his greatness is still solidified in the roller coaster-like 2020 lore.

I bet had he at least continually talked about these issues Americans would at least seen that he cared and more would’ve likely drifted to his side but instead he pleaded the 5th and abandoned the country to insult his opponents on a standup tour. This may be the closest the US has ever been to anarchy.

If Trump were to win, we’d have crap but at least the crap would be hard enough to use as a door stop against the totalitarian anti-American left from barging in for now. Trump at least has pro-American rhetoric. The left does not. Trump at least doesn’t want to impose speech restrictions, federal mask mandates (hello police brutality!), and implement white guilt as a government institution. Don’t forget he doesn’t want jacked up taxes although someone has to pay for that stimulus bill.

Biden, sort of like Trump, also seems to be suspiciously silent on rioting (calling Antifa an “idea”) while his Vice President, corrupt prosecutor, Kamala Harris set up a bail fund for these savages.

Why wouldn’t Harris want more prisoners? After all, prosecutors make their career by prosecutions but Harris probably views them as free labor. They’re leftist radicals who intimidate and can destroy the right without pay. She’s a smart woman and is apparently a great representative of the future generation of women. Oh boy.

What’ll happen if Trump wins? More rioting. What does that mean? It means Trump will largely ignore it. It means cops won’t do anything. It isn’t hip to use ANY type of violence now (even in self-defense). What happens if the victims try to defend themselves? JAIL TIME. Biden is for this. Once again, Trump has done close to nothing on this but at least he tried like a radical pushover.

Turning to cognition, what about Biden? Biden can’t keep his spit in his mouth. Poor boys? Climate warming? Corn pop? We support truth over facts? Two-hundred million have died of coronavirus? At one point 300,000,000 died of gun violence? Hairy legs that turn blond in the sunlight? He’s running for the senate apparently. Forty-seven years of nothing. I’d at least prefer a sober man who has a criminal record. That shows accomplishment.

If he gets in, it’s over. The Founders viewed the United States as an experiment. If anything, that experiment has shown that the human race cannot handle freedom. They’ve now, since 9/11, have been taught it’s dangerous. They’ve been taught that “unlimited” freedom means the ability to murder, rape, beat and rob but they’ve never been told it’s actually protection from that kind of violence and more.

Nonetheless, the peasant public school flunkies have a great understanding of what anarchy is. What about the moderates? There’s those who think we can “limit” freedom and somehow still have a “free” society? When that happens, let’s all “limit” our lung capacity because, after all, if we have “unlimited” breathing we might breathe on someone and give them coronavirus.

Freedom aside, Biden’s faction is praising China. They seriously believe they’ve gotten down to ZERO cases of coronavirus. My god. That’s right. A country who unleashed the virus on the world, hates the US and is an emerging economic superpower does great things. I hear North Korea has zero cases of coronavirus as well so go spew religious praise out of your pie holes for Fat Man. I can’t help but also think the China praise comes from a combination of, “They’re not white so who are we judge?” and “I hate Trump so much that if he said childhood suicide is bad I’d have to say no it’s not. That’s just science denial you bigot.”

By the way, what if I’m a Uyghur, gay, transgender, Muslim, Christian, or pro-America in China? Would my current corona-free mass grave be more comfortable if cured of an overrated cold? There has to be a Monty Python sketch here somewhere. “Even though we’re in a labor camp I’m glad we at least don’t have coronavirus.” Americans are sickening.

Freedom may not yield “perfect” results but it is much better than utopia – a theory hocked by tyrants since day zero.

See you next year during The Great Reset (look it up).

Face Mask Fracas

I’d like to give some thoughts on the whole face mask “controversy”. Should you wear them? Should you not wear them? Should we ditch them all together or should we would let people do as they please?

I’m going to go with the last option since it will most likely not lead everyone to being left at the whims of others.

To put it simply, it should not be mandated for states to enforce any type of mandatory mask policy for businesses, homes or for simply being outside. There is NO need for any of these authoritarian measures. The Health Department issued the mask provisions that most states have adopted yet it seems as though manipulative politicians, sometimes without even saying so, are treating them like laws. Even more alarmingly is the fact that tons of people think they are laws.

Take a look at what’s happened here.

The Health Department cannot pass laws nor has any state passed laws mandating people to wear masks. This is incredibly alarming. You have politicians and sometimes law enforcement going around enforcing “laws” that don’t even exist. That’s tyranny in a mask. In fact, North Korea, where a person can be sentenced to 3 months of hard labor for not wearing one, actually makes sense here. They’re a bonafide dictatorship yet here we have a supposedly free society cosplaying as a dictatorship when we don’t have to be.

On top of all of this, is the fact that no one really knows whether or not masks work. The most common masks are cloth masks. Studies have suggested that cloth masks may somewhat work or not work at all. I thought it was bad enough with helicopter moms being terrified about germs as much as they should be terrified about serial killers so I can only imagine the 9/11 security measures we’ll be inflicting upon innocent kids here on out.

Paraphrasing Peter Hitchens, a columnist for the Daily Mail, the entire COVID-19 panic is a great litmus test to see how compliant you would’ve been with history’s past atrocities. Sounds melodramatic? Well, there are people who think not wearing a cloth face mask will end civilization as we know it so who should win the prize here?

From the law enforcement perspective, there’s a ton of people who are violently and vocally coming out against racist police brutality. If you think that masks should be enforced by cops (something Governor Cuomo believes) be prepared for more of it. Why is the law enforcement debate in this country so moronic especially from liberals? If you want to enforce mask tyranny then you do realize that black neighborhoods should have the most police officers. After all, they are dying from it more than any other group so you have to make sure they’re wearing them.

You could be like a place in Oregon that dictated only whites had to wear face masks whereas non-whites did not have to. Definitely not racist because non-whites don’t have institutional power. Stupidity on a mask.

Think about it for once. There will be people in jail for not wearing a mask. There will be cops beating people up for not wearing fabric over their nose. While this is going on, in the background they’ll be rioters killing off a business that was 40 years of dreams come true for someone.

Do you want to know what it feels like to be a terrorist? Look no further than Delta Airlines. In order for you to get a mask exemption, you have to go through an intense vetting process trying to prove your disability (usually breathing problems). If you lie and they find out, you get put on a no-fly list until the entire pandemic will (never) be over.

Karens will also find themselves in danger. It’s bad enough we have bumbling minimum wage employees acting like bouncers but now we have fellow shoppers approaching people telling them to do something. I’m sorry but as a martial artist that’s dangerous. You don’t know who you’re yelling at. You don’t know their mental state. You don’t know how hard of a day Norman Bates just had. Karen needs to learn that telling a 6’5″ jacked dude to wrap Linus’s safety blanket around his nose could result in her funeral two days later. It’d be wrong for such an atrocity to take place but be safe and mind your own business. Let the store owner “risk” their life.

If you want to wear a mask, go ahead. If you don’t want to, please go ahead. If you’re a business who wants masks, please stipulate it. If you’re a business who doesn’t want that, please go ahead. If you are scared of contracting COVID-19, please stay inside. If you aren’t, please leave your house. Guys, 100% does not exist for anything. We’ll never get there. People think laws, laws, laws and laws will make people listen but there’s a reason why totalitarian countries have labor camps. No matter how many laws they have people still don’t listen.

A pregnant Australian woman recently got arrested at home in front of her family for posting on social media that she wanted to form an anti-quarantine protest. That’s all she did. Is that not tyranny?

Unfortunately where I go to school, George Mason University, they’ve created a policy where they control your behavior off campus. Yes, that’s right! You can’t go to “events” with more than 10 people or hang out with more than 10 people. They effectively control your life even in your home. On top of that, they are allowing students to report on other students if they see them in public violating these rules. That’s secret police.

Once a report is filed by that Kim Jong-un Jr., and the gestapo sees you on campus you can get charged with trespassing and if you refuse you’ll effectively get arrested because you attended the 10-plus attendee funeral of a loved one on Saturday. There isn’t even a fair trial here. Let’s say the little Castro that reports you has photographic and video evidence of you at such an “event”. How is that incriminating? There’s video evidence of tons of crimes yet there’s still court cases.

Who knows whether or not I’ll be in prison if the GMU gestapo reads this. Are the InfoWars guys really that wrong after all this time? No. No they’re not. We’re not lizards though…yet.

What’s an event by the way? What about grocery stores? Aren’t there more than 10 people in them? What if you go to a mall? Aren’t there usually more than 10 people there? Can I go to a movie? Those are coming back now in full vigor. Doesn’t it only take one person to carry this plague? Isn’t it more about numbers rather than about what constitutes as an “event”.

It’s tragic as well that this is happening at a school named after one of the greatest purveyors of freedom in this country.

Hypothetically, as a country, what would happen if we got to zero cases of coronavirus? Do you think we’d be “allowed” to take off the masks? Hell no. The masks are what brought us to safety in the first place. Keep wearing them these little Stalins will say.

If you want masks and they’re the savior of the human race, can’t you apply them consistently? I have to walk into a restaurant with them on but can take them off when I eat. Wal-Mart, according to a corporate memo, only enforces the mask policy at the door but once you’re in you’re free to not wear them. For now, you can walk around in Virginia without one on however there are states and places like D.C. where it’s not allowed under the penalty of Soviet Union laws (i.e., you get fined). If you don’t pay that fine I’m assuming they’ll be a warrant for your arrest eventually.

They say this isn’t tyranny and then in the next breath say, “How about you just wear a mask?”. Thank you for proving my point but at gunpoint and social pressure I will not.

The Left’s Humor

There seems to be a lot of comedians on the left lately. Don’t expect any knock-knock jokes though. Instead, be prepared for both racist and misandrist “jokes”. The two comedians we’ll be analyzing in this post are Democratic presidential candidate, Joe Biden and feminist (feminism is a subsidiary of the Democratic party), Clementine Ford.

Joe Biden, who has been on a standup tour since he first began his career in politics, “humored” the internet in an interview on The Breakfast Club podcast. Biden “joked”, “If you have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump, then you ain’t black.”

That’s really funny but then again it seems as though the Democratic party is funny in general when it comes to this form of racist “humor”.

The score for decades has been that black conservatives and, in some cases, libertarians are nothing more than a combination of Uncle Toms, Auntie Toms, lawn jockeys, tar babies and (depending upon whether or not you’re Don Lemon) negroes. These racial slurs all tend to get flung at blacks who don’t fit into the Democratic prescribed ideological “mold”.

In fact, conservative commentator Larry Elder is so sick of it that he’s embraced the term in a positive context and is making a documentary about black conservatives.

Forgive my surprise when I found that there was a fair amount of controversy surrounding Biden’s remark as if this is the first time such a comment has been directed at blacks. This is absolutely patently racist. To say that somebody should think a certain way based upon their melanin and never deviate from that is the epitome’s son of everything that is wrong right now in the identity politics bloodbath.

For some, the remark itself wasn’t problematic but instead the melanin of the person who said it as there are black liberals who are not okay with the comment simply because Joe Biden is white. Once again, when my side does it it’s okay and when your side does it it’s not okay. I’m glad to know both good and evil here are largely indistinguishable from one another.

Still, I’m not seeing how this is a joke though but here’s an argument as to why this “joke” isn’t “funny”.

Melanin has nothing to do with ideas. Ideas are the result of thinking. Sure, ideas are black and white but not in the sense of skin color but instead in the sense of right and wrong. To say an idea is rational for one group and irrational for another group is epistemologically erroneous. Being that we are human beings living in objective reality what’s true for you certainly is true for me regardless of the slightly different superficialities we may have.

Most importantly ideas are not the invention of “groups”. To say that people should think collectively is not thinking at all but instead conformity. Thinking is a product of the individual and only the individual. He or she can learn from others but others can never think for him or her. Kim Jong-un does not do the thinking for North Koreans no matter how much he tries to tell them he does.

A supposed group identity is a grammatical fiction. We’re all individuals. To refer to individuals as groups is a violation of the Law of Identity (A is A) at minimum. People and their ideas cannot nor should not be defined by their melanin. If you are a purveyor of group-think you are obviously comfortable with the idea of someone else defining who you are. Those who preach “blackness” or “whiteness” preach collectivism.

I don’t think it’s a joke. Both black and white leftists alike have a glorious history of saying things to a similar effect and Biden doesn’t seem to be deviating from their usual intellectual debauchery. Maybe I’d be willing to settle this as being a joke if liberals declare everything else he’s said as a joke. That’s a fair settlement to make. Biden and the Democratic party are jokes in and of themselves.

Sense of humor is subjective as we’ll soon learn.

On to “my favorite” – feminism.

Radical feminist, Clementine Ford, a malicious misandrist brain butcher of the highest degree has made a career built upon ideological misandry – something that Aussie tax dollars are currently paying for (see bottom).

After her, “KILL ALL MEN” Twitter rampage some years ago, now she’s “joking” about the very real deaths of men at the hands of COVID-19.

Like Biden, there’s nothing too new here. Both are mentally deficient in the “humor” department and both deploy depraved double standards whenever need be.

The cartoonish backpedaling Ford did once she surprisingly found out that people didn’t get the “joke” is cringeworthy. She tried to scurry away by pointing out that men hypocritically complain about women not getting “dark humor” yet here they are getting offended by such a comment.

Ford, like all vagina hat-thumping feminists, then deployed a recently constructed logical fallacy known as a Kafka Trap (named after Franz Kafka’s novel, The Trial). Put simply, a Kafka Trap is when denial or disagreement of an accusation is taken as a confession. The more you disagree or find the claim objectionable the more (in their eyes) you’re admitting to your “crime”. So, their claim is essentially unfalsifiable in the most illogical sense possible.

Here’s a good example of this:

According to her, the more men criticize her the more they exhibit male fragility wherein they fear being made to look “weak” and “emasculated” by a woman. Absolutely. That has to be the only reason why men might get slightly angered and outraged at such a “joke”. Once again, the more criticism and insulting she may receive the more she’ll take it as an admission of male fragility.

Like a massive stroke victim, Ford then flew off the rails in a completely different direction and went on a tangent about how this “joke” was criticizing men for not doing their fair share of “unpaid” housework during the pandemic because they’re too busy dying. This is an old feminist argument dating back to the late 60s and early 70s except here Ford awkwardly inserts COVID-19. The article, which she didn’t even originally post, has close to nothing to do with her contextless “joke”.

I’m not sure how men dying quicker even relates to them doing more housework. It’s a non-sequitur. If you want them to die quicker how can they do more housework? Why joke then if you’re trying make a serious point?

Does this mean she wants them to stop working? If they still work a full-time job to make eating possible for the family and do housework they still have (what sounds like) unequal double-duty. If they die, they actually have quadruple-duty because now they have to work, die, resurrect themselves and then take out the trash. Feminism always seems to actively tout inequality. Then again, with this current pandemic’s rapid unemployment housework may soon become non-existent for everybody for all the wrong reasons.

Take a look at this one.

“Pretend an egregious harm has been done to them!”? I thought it was feminists / women(?) who are pretending they’re the victims because they’re surviving the pandemic. It seems as if the horrific impact feminists claim this is having on women is the shoulder pain they get from acting like a spoon is an airplane for their baby.

By the way, black guys are safe from dying in her demented utopia even though they’re primarily dying from it. I thought she was being racist there for a second but now that she rearranged logic and the english language to her liking her double-standards are sound.

This isn’t a lesson in how to be comedic but instead on how to communicate with other human beings. If you want to make a joke, go ahead. If you want to make a dark joke, go ahead but context is important. If I were to tweet, “It’s funny when women die of ovarian cancer” or “Blacks can’t think for themselves” and you were to accuse me of being a sadistic racist and sexist rodent you’d be right in doing so. What I’m saying is blunt. It’s literal.

There’s no context established here for it to be anything other than what it says. Had I tweeted, “To say, “It’s funny when women die of ovarian cancer”, is absolutely abhorrent”  or “Liberals think blacks can’t think  for themselves” then I’d establish clearly what I’m trying to convey. The same is true of humor but then again a comedian can’t just spat random things out and hope they’re intrinsically funny just because of his or her profession. A good example of that is Wanda Sykes.

In the end, Ford sort of apologized but only once she found out her arts grant from the Australian government was threatened.

It’s not really an apology. What’s she’s saying is, “I’m sorry you’re not superior enough to understand me.”

Usually, the PC police (the left) hate jokes about sex and race but when it comes to insulting straight white males and non-leftist blacks, oh boy, all bets are off.

Pro-Riot Arguments

It’s a blazer outside and especially so if you unfortunately live near any of the areas where rioting is taking place. Businesses burned, lives destroyed, cities destroyed and  violence initiated on the innocent all for no reason.

Since there’s a lot of people who have fallen victim to every philosophical sin you could possibly imagine and its correlating actions you’re bound to see a variation of some of the arguments to be addressed below. It’s amazing to me how fast all of these arguments emerged and how quickly people parroted them to a T.

In no particular order:

They’re protesters.

Nope. Protesters engage in the First Amendment. Rioters destroy the welfare of society therefore violating the rights of all. Protesting is a not a rights violation.

It’s like the Boston Tea Party.

The implied “logic” behind this circus freak claim tries to expose supposed hypocrisy behind people that patriotically support the actions that led up to the founding of our country yet condemn the rioters. It’s put forth sounding something like, “You support the Boston Tea Party, which involved property damage, in order to achieve a political goal yet you don’t support the protests? It’s obvious you’re a racist because the Boston Tea Partiers were white and these protesters are fighting for black rights.”

No. First, the Boston Tea Party had a reason to take place. The British Empire routinely violated the inalienable rights of those who lived under it. Here, we have an ex-con who was murdered by a whack job cop. As horrible as it was, this does not constitute nor justify the random and sadistic targeting of society as a whole.

The tea partiers targeted property that was directly linked to The British Empire and not random stores and people. In the process, the only thing they damaged was the tea itself and the boat’s lock which was quickly replaced by them. The tea partiers also held on to stringent rules. They were to take nothing for themselves and anyone to deviate faced punishment.

It’s self-defense.

Self-defense is the act of protecting yourself from an immediate threat. For instance, George Floyd would have been morally excusable if he was able to overpower the cop and save his life. In that case, it would’ve only been morally and legally permissible if Floyd were to directly fend off the cop using the proper amount of force.

Rioting and revenge ARE NOT self-defense. Rioting involves the non-objective and unfettered act of directing force at anything one chooses. You’re not fighting off anything that’s attacking you. AutoZone, Target and sports bars along with their owners are not attacking you. They had nothing to do with what happened. Causing collateral damage for the sake of causing collateral damage is not defense but barbarism.

Attack the police.

What about the police station burning then? Libertarians who are, from what I’ve seen, against the property destruction tend to exempt the police department burning down. The logic at work seems to be along the lines of, “Well, a police officer killed the man therefore it’s acceptable to destroy anything involving the police.”

Wrong again. The concept of self-defense dictates that the amount of force you retaliate with should be proportionate to the amount of force waged against you. Destroying an entire building and putting the surrounding area in risk of numerous types of destruction far outweighs a sadistic cop killing one ex-con.

By targeting cops as collectively responsible, it also roundhouse slaps all cops as being guilty by virtue of occupation and not by action. It can easily also endanger their loved ones and fails on every level to consider that there’s cops that find Floyd’s death an unforgivable act of injustice. Plus, consider the lives of firefighters and paramedics who may be required to be in the midst of the rioting trying to save lives and property.

You must value material goods over human life.

Interestingly enough, this was something the pro-government mandated quarantine thumpers espoused many months ago. Here, they’ve resurrected this lame tearjerker and are trying to apply it to the nationwide debauchery.

This is conditional. There are certain people who I value my possessions over. That’s a perfectly moral stance. A woman who owns a priceless pearl necklace has every moral justification in the book to value that over the life of a thug trying to break into her house. A man with an Aston Martin has every moral justification in the book to value it over the life of the man who tried to rape his daughter. A person whose livelihood is supported by their business has every moral justification in the book to value it over the looters who wish to destroy it.

This is nothing more than lame brained rhetoric to try and take your breath away and make you look like you’re a materialistic monster.

Like every intellectual abomination to support the riots, there’s flawed premises at work here.

Material goods are the result of human life and establish the livelihood of the creator(s) and the society he or she trades them with. As a result of producing goods, people have established property rights. Property rights entail freedom and protect you from the aggression of others. Property is the moral barrier that prevents humans from dealing with each other by violence. Property rights are an extension of individual rights (i.e., it sustains life). Once you’ve taken away property you’ve violated rights. There’s a reason why slaves can’t own property.

Without property rights you get what we have now.

Someone on Facebook commented to me, “I’d gladly lose my material possessions to be an ally in this fight.”

At first glance, it sounds like he’s admitting that they are rioting burglars. I agree. Once you think about it though it openly advocates suicide. Translated it says, “I’m willing to kill myself for the sake of others who are destroying society.” The anti-materialists though are ironically supporting the materialists. I’ve yet to figure out what stealing spark plugs from AutoZone has to do with Floyd’s life.

By the way, remember that pets are legally considered property. Why do I have a feeling the “anti-materialists” will start to pick and choose which possessions they’d like to keep?

Who’s life is this by the way? Floyd’s life or the life of the looters? One person’s life or death should never overtake the livelihood of others whether it’s Floyd’s or anybody else’s. The reverse is the same. We shouldn’t have to sacrifice ourselves on a societal level to someone that died. We’re not collectively guilty.

Get ready for this one. I’m paraphrasing a tweet.

“We” built this country therefore we get to burn it down.

As you might guess by the use of the word “we”, it was written by someone who is black.

If this is the case, does that mean the assembly line workers that built your car get to destroy it? Does that mean the construction workers that built your house get to cut its gas line? Does that mean that the farmers who laboriously harvested the vegetables in your salad get to eat them? Moreover, does building something mean you automatically own it?

In this case it wouldn’t even be the current laborers that own them let alone produced them. Instead, it’d be people that shared the same melanin as them from centuries ago. In fact, if you pay close attention it’s not even about the type of labor but more or less the melanin of the laborers.

Legally, I’m pretty sure you can’t just destroy your property either. If it’s a windup toy I’m sure you can but if you built your house and burn it down or set your car on fire I’m confident that you’ll face harsh legal penalties rightfully so.

This is also effectively saying whites are slaves to blacks. If blacks are the builders and owners and can take away property from whites they’re the slave masters and whites are the slaves.

There you go. Autozone is the result of the legacy of slavery. Mystery solved.

How dare you tell blacks how to protest.

Not just blacks but anybody. Yes, there is a code of conduct for protests in that it ceases being a protest once rights are violated. Saying whites cannot perform a certain action (i.e., judgment) and blacks can getaway with whatever actions they see fit is a textbook example of racism.

Relativistic thinking is brazenly anti-thinking and therefore immoral. If you refuse moral judgement you can easily end up being the victim of what you refused to judge.

I could’ve stopped it at the initial argument though. There aren’t any protests to begin with so there. Most importantly, when everyone is held to different standards they are immediately placed into an “alternate reality”. And when other people are placed into an alternate reality of judgement we have division. And when we have division, we have a civil war. In the end, we’re all held accountable to different standards and I thought this was about equality.

You didn’t like their other forms of protest Pt. 1.

This refers to any peaceful protests that may have occurred such as the famous Colin Kaepernick NFL “take a knee protest”. Yes. People did have problems with that but it wasn’t the kneeling itself. It was a combination of what he said and where he said it. Hoards of people disagreed with the idea of the United States being an inherently racist country along with those who didn’t want soapboxing in sports.

If they think whites hated their prior forms of peaceful protest what makes them think rioting will change their opinions for the better? This easily plays into the hands of white supremacists who characterize blacks as rioting and looting savages. It seems as though they’re inadvertently proving the white supremacists right even though they’d still be wrong in their racist judgement.

People criticizing a protest doesn’t mean they’re not okay with freedom of expression.

It’s also an argument for the ends justifying the means. Why is this wrong though? It’s wrong because the end doesn’t exist since only means do. We’re always in the present and have to think long range. We have to always be aware of what we’re immediately doing and how it will effect where we’re going. The end justifies the means method has no moral regard for the present so what makes them think it’ll have moral regard for the end. If you want to achieve a desired goal it needs to match up with what came before it. Pertaining to the context of the riots, you don’t achieve peace by violence.

What’s the goal here? Where does property destruction take you other than back to your burned down home?

Interestingly enough, the supposedly systemically racist conspiracy at work has fought back against Floyd’s aggressor. The cop is fired and charged with murder. Police unions have spoken out against his actions and Trump has ordered an FBI investigation.

You didn’t like their other forms of protest Pt. 2: Peaceful protests fell on deaf ears.

No. Peaceful protests like Kaeperknick’s did not fall on deaf ears as evidenced by the public response to them. People strongly disagreed and agreed. If being ignored means getting a 14 trillion dollar endorsement from Nike I wish more people would ignore me.

How does this justify destruction though? If you say it’s a matter of getting others to listen to you you couldn’t be more wrong. You get people to listen by persuasion not violence. If you initiate force the only thing people can do is use force (rightfully so) in return. All you’ll do is further convince them that your side is destructive and built upon threats. Violence isn’t a conversation.

What kind of an argument is this? Being ignored means you’re justified in initiating violence? Is it always permissible for cops to initiate violence on someone who ignores them? Is it permissible to punch somebody in the face for ignoring you? What if a child’s parents don’t listen to him and he kills his sister for their attention? Is that justifiable?

It sounds like they’re saying they’re little demented kids begging for attention. I agree. That shows you what their movement is worth.

Sympathy

Some are saying they’re against the rioting yet are sympathetic or understanding as to why it’s happening. If you manage to complete the rest of the sentence past “sympathetic” you should realize that you cannot ever condemn something and then be “understanding” and “sympathetic” about it. Those are feelings and capacities that must be directed by reason and only deservedly applied rationally to things that you should not condemn.

The supposed arbiters of these sentiments are by default apologists for the rioters. They openly admit they understand the motivations behind destroying cities.

The sympathy argument is one big supposed understanding of a violent non-sequitur. If your mom were killed what would you do? Go outside and randomly target innocent civilians and their homes? How would that be worthy of sympathetic understanding?

If you are to allot sympathy to anybody allot it to the innocent business owners and civilians who were victimized by these savages. Save your tears for the victims not the victimizers.

Why didn’t you criticize the anti-lockdown protests? They had guns and “stormed” state capitals.

1. They protested.
2. They didn’t kill or injure anyone or destroy property.
3. Most of these protesters utilized their First and Second Amendment rights which is perfectly legal. A lot of cops are smart enough to know that it’s not legal to randomly tackle somebody just for holding a gun for those of you who say it was only because they were (predominantly?) white. 
4. Their protest made sense. They were petitioning the government to hand back their livelihoods and not force them into their homes.

Now, you can raise the question of whether or not it was sound to bring guns. I don’t think it was. Then again, cops were arresting people for pretty much being outside so maybe they had a point in “scaring” off cops. Either way, I don’t think the guns were smart.

I’m also not saying they didn’t do anything moronic or uncalled for but I’m okay with an angry belligerent moron if the city is still intact afterwards.

This point also treats white cops as a collective and therefore accuses all of them of having double standards when it comes to white or black protestors. It looks at an incident like the Floyd case and assumes that’s how white cops act when confronted with blacks. So, if a white cop has a “peaceful” encounter with a white civilian it’s immediately assumed it wouldn’t be that way with a black civilian. All of these examples are cherry-picked. They’ll take a photo of an angry white protestor from the quarantine protests and then juxtapose it against the Floyd case and then claim it proves their point.

They take two completely different situations with completely different officers and then try and make ties between them based around skin color.

The bottom line here is if they truly let white quarantine protestors get away with whatever it is they did why’d they even bother sending out cops to patrol these events in the first place? Why are they currently letting white rioters destroy cities right now?

Bankers who looted money during the financial collapse didn’t go to jail but there are “protestors” that did.

Maybe because lunatics on a rampage throughout a city are more of an immediate threat than guys who siphoned money through loopholes and lobbying.

This is assuming the unnamed people that maintain these occupations actually did that.

Conspiracies

Trump has recently tweeted that he is going to label Antifa a terrorist organization. It’s about time. There’s also evidence emerging to suggest that Antifa could’ve agitated the protest to which I wouldn’t be surprised. Antifa (mostly white kids) has continuously billed themselves as an organization that fights against things like systemic racism by rioting. However, here they’re exhibiting a morbid comedy of errors.

They claim to be allies to blacks yet are inadvertently doing the dirty work of would be white supremacists by burning down black neighborhoods.

It’s interesting to note the 180 that’s been pulled here. At first, people were saying these weren’t riots but instead protests against racism. Then the rioting escalated to the point where I think they realized they couldn’t rationalize it as protesting anymore. So, what’d they do? They admitted they were riots and then claimed they were committed by supposed far-right white supremacists and condemned them! I’m a little confused. Now pro-racists are fighting using what were once considered anti-racist tactics? Unreal.

If it’s white supremacists then why do they indiscriminately destroy businesses run by other whites?

Then they’ll claim that they initially started out peacefully. Okay, that’s fine but it didn’t stay that way for long and to blame this on only Antifa is sinful. There’s tons of others participating not limited to Black Lives Matter. Whoever did it should be convicted. We shouldn’t sit around trying to nonsensically pin it on who we want to for the sake of our agenda. If it’s white supremacists jail them. If it’s Black Lives Matter jail them. If it’s the cast of Cats jail them. I don’t care as long as the guilty are jailed.

Collectivism

Collectivism is the way Americans are currently thinking. My side is right. Your side is wrong. When you’re “wrong” you’re everything wrong with the world and deserve everything that my side has directed at you. Black Lives Matter stokes this perfectly. By saying immediately that someone’s life “matters” because of their melanin that will ultimately create rioting and needless protest anytime someone with that melanin gets harmed (justified or not).

It frees them of moral judgement. So, if a black person is killed (especially by a white and it seems like only by a white) no judgement is made as to whether or not the killing was justified. It assumes all my tribe members unconditionally “matter”. This undoubtedly breeds conformity in that they’ve been taught to uphold their tribe at all costs. People’s lives matter in that they should all be held equally under the law regardless of race or sex but still should be judged according to action(s). This we should all have in common.

It’s an absolute religion. Whichever black dies at the hands of only a white he’ll become their Jesus – an inadvertent sacrifice to show what is wrong with the world.

In this religion though black lives matter only when they’re killed by whites and not by blacks.

I hope the rioting stops but at least COVID-19 seems to have miraculously been “cured”. The frustrating thing though is that just as the country was opening up parts of it are shutting down once again except this time it seems justifiable due to severe threats of violence.

Originally, the pious quarantine thumpers and politicians espoused it wasn’t acceptable to open your barber shop but now we can assume it’s acceptable for others to destroy your barber shop.

I support protests against the bastard cop but right now I’m not seeing anything by and large that resembles a protest so I have close to nothing to support.